Male Perspective on Construction of Masculinity: Issues and Challenges in Lahore
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v3i1.163Keywords:
Male Perspectives, Masculinity, Gender Role Strain, Essentialism, ConstructionismAbstract
Masculinity is the dominant gender discourse of masculine behaviour embedded in men’s everyday practices, behaviours, and actions. Since at least the 1980s, these gendered social norms have been argued to create stress, strain, and conflicts for men. Investigating those experiences and circumstances where gender patterns are less or more open to change is an important task of this research. Therefore, this study aims to include men in the “study up” approach of the gender research domain and include their experiences in the conversation of gendered lobbying under patriarchal perceptions. Using the Gender Role Strain paradigm as a guiding framework, the study intends to explore the male perspective on the construction of masculinity in contemporary Pakistani society. A qualitative phenomenological research design has been used, and snowball and purposive sampling techniques are used in conjunction for the recruitment of participants with the help of pre-defined inclusion criteria. The participants of the study are diverse in terms of age, educational background, and family situation. Each participant was interviewed at length using an in-depth interview guide, including topics from the beginning of childhood across the lifespan. The result of the interviews supports the social constructionist perspective of masculinity and also focuses on the strain and challenges of the masculine norms associated with the existing conceptions of masculinity and gender role strain.
References
Adil, F., Shahed, S., & Arshad, H. (2017). The burden of being a man in a patriarchal society. Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 4(2), 57-70.
Akhter, N., & Akbar, R. (2016). Critical Analysis of Life of Pakistani Women: Views of Educated Women. Journal of Elementary Education, 26(1), 111–121.
Ali, P. A., & Gavino, M. I. B. (2008). Violence against women in Pakistan: A framework for analysis. Journal-Pakistan Medical Association, 58(4), 198.
Amin, A., Kågesten, A., Adebayo, E., & Chandra-Mouli, V. (2018). Addressing Gender Socialization and Masculinity Norms Among Adolescent Boys: Policy and Programmatic Implications. Journal of Adolescent Health, 62(3), S3–S5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.06.022
Blazina, C., & Watkins Jr, C. E. (1996). Masculine gender role conflict: Effects on college men's psychological well-being, chemical substance usage, and attitudes towards help-seeking. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(4), 461.
Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological review, 106(4), 676.
Bozok, M. (2012). Constructing local masculinities: A case study from Trabzon, Turkey.
Burn, S. M., & Ward, A. Z. (2005). Men's Conformity to Traditional Masculinity and Relationship Satisfaction. Psychology of men & masculinity, 6(4), 254.
Brod, H., & Kaufman, M. (Eds.). (1994). Theorizing masculinities (Vol. 5). Sage Publications
Clark, J. N. (2014). A crime of identity: Rape and its neglected victims. Journal of Human Rights, 13(2), 146-169.
Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities: Knowledge, power and social change. Berkeley/Los.
Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University.
Coles, T. (2009). Negotiating the field of masculinity: The production and reproduction of multiple dominant masculinities. Men and masculinities, 12(1), 30-44.
Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639
Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities: Knowledge, power and social change. Berkeley/Los.
Carter, M. (2014). Gender Socialization and Identity Theory. Social Sciences, 3(2), 242–263. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci3020242
Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Davis, T., & Laker, J. A. (2004). Connecting men to academic and student affairs programs and services. New Directions for Student Services, 2004(107), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.132
Daly, K., & Chesney-Lind, M. (1988). Feminism and criminology. Justice Quarterly, 5(4), 497–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418828800089871
Davis, T., & Laker, J. A. (2004). Connecting men to academic and student affairs programs and services. New Directions for Student Services, 2004(107), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.132
Eckert, P., & Mcconnell-Ginet, S. (2003). Language and Gender. New York: Cambridge.
Edwards, K. E., & Jones, S. R. (2009). “Putting My Man Face On”: A Grounded Theory of College Men’s Gender Identity Development. Journal of College Student Development, 50(2), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0063
England, P. (2010). The Gender Revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender & Society, 24(2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210361475
Esplen, E. (2006). Engaging men in gender equality: positive strategies and approaches: overview and annotated bibliography. Institute Of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
Fischer, A. R. (2007). Parental relationship quality and masculine gender-role strain in young men: Mediating effects of personality. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 328-358.
Fields, E. L., Bogart, L. M., Smith, K. C., Malebranche, D. J., Ellen, J., & Schuster, M. A. (2015). “I Always Felt I Had to Prove My Manhood”: Homosexuality, Masculinity, Gender Role Strain, and HIV Risk Among Young Black Men Who Have Sex with Men. American Journal of Public Health, 105(1), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2013.301866
Gelfer, J. (2016). The Five Stages of Masculinity: A New Model for Understanding Masculinities. Masculinities & Social Change, 5(3), 268. https://doi.org/10.17583/mcs.2016.2169
Hearn, J., & Collinson, D. L. (1998). Men, masculinities, managements and organisational culture. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(2), 210-222.
Heimer, K. (2000). Changes in the gender gap in crime and women’s economic marginalization. Criminal Justice, 1, 427-483.
Hadebe, L. (2010). Zulu masculinity: culture, faith and the constitution in the South African context (Doctoral dissertation).
Harris, F., & Harper, S. R. (2008). Masculinities go to community college: Understanding male identity socialization and gender role conflict. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2008(142), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.322
Hussain, S., Habib, B., &Akhter, J. (2014). Computational Analysis of" Stereotypes as Cause of Gender Inequality": A Study of Universities of South Punjab, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS), 34(2).
Kahn, J. S. (2009). An introduction to masculinities. John Wiley & Sons.
Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. Yale University Press.
Lorber, J. (2004). “Night to his day”: The social construction of gender. Race, class, and gender in the United States: An integrated study, 6, 54-65.
O’Neil, J. M. (2008). Summarizing 25 Years of Research on Men’s Gender Role Conflict Using the Gender Role Conflict Scale. The Counselling Psychologist, 36(3), 358–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000008317057
Peretz, T. (2016). Why Study Men and Masculinities? A Theorized Research Review. Graduate Journal of Social Science, 12(3).
Rabbani, F., Qureshi, F., & Rizvi, N. (2008). Perspectives on domestic violence: case study from Karachi, Pakistan. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal = La Revue de Sante de La Mediterranee Orientale = Al-Majallah Al-Sihhiyah Li-Sharq Al-Mutawassit, 14(2), 415–426. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18561735
Raza, F. A. (2007). Reasons for the Lack of Women’s Participation in Pakistan’s Workforce. Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies, 3(3), 99–102. https://doi.org/10.2979/mew.2007.3.3.99
Rehman, S., & Azam Roomi, M. (2012). Gender and work‐life balance: a phenomenological study of women entrepreneurs in Pakistan. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 19(2), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001211223865
Schacht, S., & Ewing, D. (Eds.). (1998). Feminism and men: Reconstructing gender relations. NYU Press.
Schwartz, J. P., Waldo, M., & Daniel, D. (2005). Gender-Role Conflict and Self-Esteem: Factors Associated With Partner Abuse in Court-Referred Men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 6(2), 109.
Smiler, A. P., & Gelman, S. A. (2008). Determinants of Gender Essentialism in College Students. Sex Roles, 58(11-12), 864–874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9402-x
Tranter, D. (2005). Different than dad: a phenomenological exploration of masculine gender role strain (Doctoral dissertation, Memorial University of Newfoundland).
Thomas, K. D., & Levent, R. F. (2012). Does the endorsement of traditional masculinity ideology moderate the relationship between exposure to violent video games and aggression?. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 20(1), 47-56.
Tahir, M. (2017). Domestic Violence against Women in Pakistan and its Solution from an Islamic Perspective: A Critical and Analytical Study. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2986723
Thompson Jr, E. H., & Pleck, J. H. (1995). Masculinity ideologies: A review of research instrumentation on men and masculinities.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & society, 1(2), 125-151.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Copyright in the Journal of Social Sciences Review is retained by the author(s). Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
SSR's Editorial Board shares the vision of providing free access to information, education, and science for everyone, thus promoting its content through an OPEN ACCESS POLICY, fulfilling the DOAJ definition of open access. The JSSR adheres to an Open Access and Copyright Licensing Policy based on the belief that making research freely accessible to the public promotes greater global knowledge sharing.
The JSSR uses the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. The authors who apply and publish in JSSR consent to abide by the copyright policy set out in the Creative Commons 4.0 license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license).
- Copyright in the Journal of Social Sciences Review is retained by the author(s).
- Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
While "By 'open access' to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself."
