Effects of Teacher Teaching Approaches on Students Engagement and Comprehension at University Level

Authors

  • Muhmmad Mujtaba Haider Ph.D. Scholar, Institute of Education and Research, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, KP, Pakistan.
  • Raham Zaid Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, KP, Pakistan.
  • Sultan Akbar Shah Ph.D. Scholar, Institute of Education and Research, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, KP, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v3i2.362

Keywords:

Autonomous-supportive Teaching Style, Controlling Teaching Style, Curiosity and Comprehension, Student Engagement

Abstract

Teachers influence academic engagement and lifelong achievement. However, little is known about whether instructional styles explain these associations or whether they differ across academic and "non-cognitive" outcomes. In classrooms, teacher-student interaction helps pupils learn. In this cross-sectional study of 229 university students, perceived teaching style and student engagement, curiosity, and comprehension are examined. Student Engagement Instrument and Curiosity and Comprehension Inventory were employed. Students perceived both Autonomous-supportive and controlling teaching approaches. However, students' ratings of teachers' support and control differed significantly (t (229)=3.942 and 4.774, respectively). Perceived autonomy support teaching style was moderately correlated with student engagement (r=.463), curiosity, and comprehension (r=.318). The findings explain how teaching style affects students' interest and classroom engagement.

References

Ali, A., & Ahmad, I. (2011). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in distance learning courses: A study of Allama Iqbal Open University. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6047

Allan, J., Clarke, K., & Jopling, M. (2009). Effective teaching in Higher Education: Perceptions of first year undergraduate students. The International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(3), 362–372. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ909070.pdf

Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20303

Bernaus, M. Wilson, A. and Gardner, R. (2009) Teachers’ Motivation, Classroom Strategy Use, Students’ Motivation and Second Language Achievement. LainnugeulaVruemz. 25-36. https://doi.org/10.30827/digibug.31869

Benita, M., Roth, G., & Deci, E. L. (2014). When are mastery goals more adaptive? It depends on experiences of autonomy support and autonomy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 258-267. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034007

Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2006). Teacher-student matching and the assessment of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Human Resources, XLI(4), 778-820. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.xli.4.778

Conrad, L. (2017). Students' attachment styles to their professors: Patterns of achievement, curiosity, exploration, self-criticism, self-reassurance, and autonomy. All College Thesis Program, (30).

Fall, A., & Roberts, G. (2012). High school dropouts: Interactions between social context, self-perceptions, school engagement, and student dropout. Journal of Adolescence, 35(4), 787-798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.11.004

Gillet, N., Vallerand, R. J., Amoura, S., & Baldes, B. (2010). Influence of coaches' autonomy support on athletes' motivation and sport performance: A test of the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11(2), 155-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.10.004

Hallinan, M. T. (2008). Teacher influences on students' attachment to school. Sociology of Education, 81(3), 271-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070808100303

Herrell, A. and Jordan, M. (2004). Fifty Strategies for Teaching English Language Learners. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.

Jaggars, S. S., & Xu, D. (2016). How do online course design features influence student performance? Computers & Education, 95, 270-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.014

Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122-149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.99.1.122

Ladyshewsky, R. K. (2013). Instructor presence in online courses and student satisfaction. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2013.070113

Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students' perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120099359

Močinić, S. N. (2012). Active teaching strategies in higher education. Metodički obzori/Methodological Horizons, 7(2), 97-105. https://doi.org/10.32728/mo.07.2.2012.08

Murnane, R. J., & Phillips, B. R. (1981). What do effective teachers of inner-city children have in common? Social Science Research, 10(1), 83-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0049-089x(81)90007-7

Nandi, P. L., Chan, J. N., Chan, C. P., Chan, P., & Chan, L. P. (2000). Undergraduate medical education: Comparison of problem-based learning and conventional teaching. Hong Kong Medical Journal, 6(3), 301-306.

Ouyang, F., & Scharber, C. (2017). The influences of an experienced instructor's discussion design and facilitation on an online learning community development: A social network analysis study. The Internet and Higher Education, 35, 34-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.07.002

Pelletier, L.G., Fortier, M.S., Vallerand, R.J. et al. Associations Among Perceived Autonomy Support, Forms of Self-Regulation, and Persistence: A Prospective Study. Motivation and Emotion 25, 279–306 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014805132406

Quan-Haase, A. (2007). University students' local and distant social ties: Using and integrating modes of communication on campus. Information, Communication & Society, 10(5), 671-693. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180701658020

Reio, T. G., Marcus, R. F., & Sanders-Reio, J. (2009). Contribution of student and instructor relationships and attachment style to school completion. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 170(1), 53-72. https://doi.org/10.3200/gntp.170.1.53-72

Riley, P. (2009). An adult attachment perspective on the student–teacher relationship & classroom management difficulties. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 626-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.11.018

Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents’ motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 437-460. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038002437

Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., & Dochy, F. (2009). The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy support and structure in the prediction of self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709908x304398

Sinclair, M. F., Christenson, S. L., & Thurlow, M. L. (2005). Promoting school completion of urban secondary youth with emotional or behavioral disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71(4), 465-482. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100405

Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571-581. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571

Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2010). A theoretical upgrade of the concept of parental psychological control: Proposing new insights on the basis of self-determination theory. Developmental Review, 30(1), 74-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.11.001

Tessier, D., Sarrazin, P., & Ntoumanis, N. (2008). The effects of an experimental programme to support students’ autonomy on the overt behaviours of physical education teachers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23(3), 239-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03172998

Vansteenkiste, M., Zhou, M., Lens, W., & Soenens, B. (2005). Experiences of autonomy and control among Chinese learners: Vitalizing or immobilizing? Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 468-483. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.468

Wentzel, K. R., & Caldwell, K. (1997). Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: Realtions to academic achievement in middle school. Child Development, 68(6), 1198-1209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01994.x

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Haider, M. M., Zaid, R., & Shah, S. A. (2023). Effects of Teacher Teaching Approaches on Students Engagement and Comprehension at University Level. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 3(2), 1151–1161. https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v3i2.362