Apology Strategies in Hindko: An Explanatory Intercultural Research


  • Shahid Hussain Mir PhD Scholar, Department of English, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Mahwish Ashiq Lecturer, Department of English, Women University Bagh, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Kamran Assistant Professor, Department of Education, University of Loralai, Balochistan, Pakistan.




Apology Strategies, Hindko, Turkish, Social, Cultural, Inter and Cross-Cultural, Pragmatics


Intercultural and cross-cultural studies play a significant role in understanding the influence of culture on communication, especially pragmatic communication in any language. The current study aims to explore the phenomenon of apology strategies used by Hindko speakers enrolled at the University of Kotli and the University of AJK Muzaffarabad. The data were collected through a Discourse Completion Test from 10 speakers of Hindko enrolled in various departments at the University of Kotli and UAJK Muzaffarabad. The Turkish language data were adopted as a reference from a research study conducted by Cetinavei (2012). The Hindko data were analyzed using the theoretical framework presented by Blum-Kulka et.al (1984). The findings of the research show that Hindko speakers show variation in using apology strategies. Hindko speakers use more direct explanation and denial strategies, whereas Turkish speakers use indirect responsibility and explanation strategies. Moreover, the analysis also shows that Hindko speakers use forgiveness strategies more frequently than other strategies like intensifying or taking responsibility. The research opens doors for future researchers to dig into the comparative aspects of the languages with other European languages.


Bergman, M. and Kasper, G. (1993). Perception and Performance in Native and Non-Native Apology. In: Gabrielle, K. and Shohona, B., Eds., Interlanguage Pragmatics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 82-117.

Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Blum-Kulka, S. (1983). Interpreting and performing speech acts in a second language: A cross-cultural study of Hebrew and English. In N. Wolfson & E. Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition (pp. 36-55). New York, NY: Newbury House.

Brown, P., Levinson, S. C., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.

Beebe, L. M., & Waring, H. Z. (2004). The linguistic encoding of pragmatic tone: Adverbials as words that work. Studying speaking to inform second language learning, 228-249.

Cohen, A. (1996). Developing the Ability to Perform Speech Acts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(2), 253-267. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310001490X

Cohen, Andrew A. (1996). Developing the ability to perform speech acts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18 (2): 253-267.

Cetinavci. U. (2012). Apologizing in Turkish Language: An Intracultural and Intercultural Exploratory study. Contemporary Online Language Education Journal, 2012, 1, 72-104.

D.A. Cruse (2018). Meaning in language: an introduction to semantics and pragmatics. OUP, Oxford.

Derakhshan, A., & Eslami, Z. R. (2019). Second language pragmatics: From theory to research. Intercultural Pragmatics, 16(5), 611-617. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2019-0030

Gow, J. N. (2021). Reworking race, nation, and diaspora on the margins. Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, 21(2), 209-230. https://doi.org/10.3138/diaspora.21.2.2021.05.04

Hussain, M., & Aziz, A. (2020). Cross-cultural pragmatic study of apology strategies in Balochi with reference to Chinese language. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 5(2), 152-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol5iss2pp152-169

Holmes, J. (1989). Sex differences and apologies: One aspect of communicative Competence1. Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 194-213. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.2.194

Holman, D. (n.d.). Call centres. The New Workplace, 115-134. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470713365.ch7

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, Behaviours, Institutions and Organizations across Nations. CA: Thousand Oaks, Sage.

Jucker, A. H. (2019). Speech act attenuation in the history of English: The case of apologies. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.878

Jordà, M. P. (2005). Pragmatic production of third language learners of English: A focus on request acts modifiers. International Journal of Multilingualism, 2(2), 84-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710508668378

Leech. G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. Longman, London.

Matsuoka, K., Kotani, I., & Yamasato, M. (2012). Correct information unit analysis for determining the characteristics of narrative discourse in individuals with chronic traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 26(13-14), 1723-1730. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2012.698789

Mir, S.H., Ahmed. S. L., & Kamran, M. (2022). Corona Humourism: A Corpus Based Sociolinguistic Study of WhatsApp Messages of Pakistani English Teachers. Periodics. Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2), 197-214

Nureddeen, F. A. (2008). Cross cultural pragmatics: Apology strategies in Sudanese Arabic. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(2), 279-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.11.001

Saleem, T., & Azam, S. (2015). A socio-pragmatic Analysis of appropriateness in a speech act of apology in English. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 6(1), 4-13.

Taguchi, N., & Ishihara, N. (2018). The pragmatics of English as a Lingua Franca: Research and pedagogy in the era of globalization. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 38, 80-101. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190518000028

Trosborg, A. (2003). The teaching of business pragmatics. Pragmatic competence and foreign language teaching, 247-281.

Tanck, S. (2002). Speech Act sets of refusal and complaint: A comparison of native and nonnative English speakers’ production. TESOL Working Papers, Series 2.

Trosborg, A. (1987). Apology strategies in natives/non-natives. Journal of Pragmatics, 11(2), 147-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(87)90193-7




How to Cite

Mir, S. H., Ashiq, M., & Kamran, M. . (2023). Apology Strategies in Hindko: An Explanatory Intercultural Research. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 3(2), 538–554. https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v3i2.228