Dimensions of Res Judicata Applicability in Pakistan

Authors

  • Hafiz Abdul Rehman Saleem Assistant Professor, Department of Law, University of Sahiwal, Sahiwal, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Hamid Mukhtar Assistant Professor, Department of Law, University of Okara, Okara, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Imtiaz Ahmad Khan Associate Professor, Department of Law, University of Sahiwal, Sahiwal, Punjab, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v3i2.166

Keywords:

Res Judicata, Public Policy, CPC, Pakistan, Judiciary

Abstract

Res judicata is a matter of public policy and right during any litigation.  The doctrine is discussed in the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (CPC 1908) with an exhaustive instance of applicability and inapplicability in Section 11. However, the explanation given in Section 11 appears in-exhaustive considering the broader spectrum of cases and scenarios. This manuscript consolidates the instances that complement section 11 to formulate the ever-exhaustive list of instances for the proper application of res judicata. The study conducted case-based research and extracted the rules formulated in the judicial decisions by the higher judiciary. The present research contemplates a better comprehension of the rules that can save the public right of litigation and also inhibit unnecessary instances of frivolous litigation.

References

ABDUL RAUF KHAN v MUHAMMAD HANIF & 14 others, SC (AJ&K) PLJ 206 (SC (AJ&K) 2013). https://www.pljlawsite.com/html/PLJ2013SA206.htm

Amar, A. R. (1994). Fourth Amendment first principles. Harvard Law Review, 107(4), 757. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341994

AKRAM & 3 others v NAZAR ALI & others, Queta PLJ 19 (Quetta High Court 2012). https://pljlawsite.com/html/PLJ2012Q19.htm

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. (n.d.).

Dainow, J. (1966). The Civil Law and the Common Law: Some Points of Comparison. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 15(3), 419–435. https://doi.org/10.2307/838275

KHAIRAT MASIH (deceased through legal heirs) V AZIZ SADIQ, Lahore PLJ 671 (Lahore High Court 2004). https://pljlawsite.com/html/PLJ2004L671.htm

Khursheed Ahmed Versus Fayyaz Ahmad and 7 Others, PLD 234 (2006).

MASOOD ANJUM, ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT (F), POSTAL LIFE INSURANCE, SAHIWAL and another V DIRECTOR GENERAL PAKISTAN POST, ISLAMABAD and 3 others, Tr.C. (Services) PLJ 63 (Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad 2012). https://pljlawsite.com/html/PLJ2012T63.htm

Maurice Mirosolin. (2022). Doctrine of Res Judicata. Pacific Law Group. https://pacificlaw.ca/cased-closed-doctrine-of-res-judicata/

Mendelson, D. (2012). The Duchess of Kingston’s Case, the ruling of Lord Mansfield and duty of medical confidentiality in court. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 35(5–6), 480–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJLP.2012.09.005

Mian MUHAMMAD SHAFI and another V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MIANCHANNU DISTRICT KHANEWAL and 14 others, Multan Bench Multan PLJ 1225 (Lahore High Court 2006). https://pljlawsite.com/html/PLJ2006L1225.htm

Mst. JEWAN BIBI and two others V INAYAT MASIH, PLJ 1718 (Supreme Court 1996).

MUHAMMAD BAKHSH V MUHAMMAD JUNAID and 3 others, Multan Bench Multan PLJ 1167 (Lahore High Court 2015). https://pljlawsite.com/html/PLJ2015L1167.htm

MUHAMMAD IQBAL V Mst. NASREEN AKHTAR, Lahore PLJ 524 (Lahore High Court 2012). https://pljlawsite.com/html/PLJ2012L524.htm

MUHAMMAD KABIR Vs SECRETARY GOVT. OF PUNJAB etc, PLJ 707 (Lahore High Court 2011). https://pljlawsite.com/html/PLJ2011L707.htm

MUHAMMAD MALIK v CHIEF EXECUTIVE & 6 Others, Law Note (Civil) PLJ 156 (Labour Appellate Tribunal Balochistan, Quetta 2019). https://www.pljlawsite.com/html/PLJ2019LNC156.htm

Muhammad Rafiq v Chief Election Commissioner of Pakistan and four Others, MLD 132 (2008).

MUNIR, M. (2008). Precedent in Islamic Law with Special Reference to the Federal Shariat Court and the Legal System in Pakistan. Islamic Studies, 47(4), 445–482.

SHAH MUHAMMAD and others V SECRETARY, M/O COMMUNICATION, GOVT. OF PAKISTAN ISLAMABAD and 2 others, Tr.C. (Services) PLJ 322 (Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad 2006). https://pljlawsite.com/html/PLJ2006T322.htm

Syed AGHA HUSSAIN SHAH and others V Mst. DEENA BIBI and others, D.I. Khan Bench PLJ 1 (Peshawar High Court 2017). https://pljlawsite.com/html/PLJ2017P1.htm

Thomas, T. A. (2004). Ubi Jus, Ibi Remdium: The Fundamental Right to a Remedy Under Due Process. San Diego Law Review, 41, 1633–1640. https://digital.sandiego.edu/sdlr/vol41/iss4/12

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Saleem, H. A. R., Mukhtar, H., & Khan, I. A. (2023). Dimensions of Res Judicata Applicability in Pakistan. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 3(2), 686–694. https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v3i2.166